Article by Suchetana Phani who worked for two weeks in Special Collections as part of the Professional Pathways internship programme run by the University. Suchetana is studying for an MA in Magic and Occult Science at Exeter.

As someone who changed her entire career trajectory and crossed two oceans to land in Exeter after documenting a family archive of my grandfather’s love letters and my great grandfather’s refugee certificate post the 1947 Partition, I am no stranger to the power of stories.
Historically, access to archives had often been determined by power, social status, education, ownership and access to travel. While most of these factors continue to persist as barriers to archival access in the contemporary era, we exist at a point in history where these narratives are further endangered by factors ranging from storage concerns, loss of physical objects, different kinds of item damage to funding cuts for the Arts and Heritage Sector, and the ever-looming miasma of generative AI ventriloquizing the human experience.
But that didn’t (and still doesn’t) deter me from my goals of working in the Heritage sector to actively participate in preserving human narratives in order to bridge the visibility gap between people and their collective cultural heritage. So, getting the opportunity to work as a Collections Assistant for the University of Exeter’s Special Collections through a two-week internship through the University’s Pathways to Arts, Culture and Heritage Program felt like another step closer to my dreams.
Me and my fellow Pathways colleague, Sophia were assigned boxes of previously uncatalogued items from the Henry Williamson Archive, with instructions to go through the material and catalogue it as per archival standards. I had been personally unaware of Williamson thus far, but my initial research surrounding his work, which seemed interesting, and his politics, which were less so, had given me mixed feelings about the content with which I was about to engage.


As I got to work on cataloguing Williamson’s diaries from 1929 to 1975, my emotions surrounding the author became further complicated. Having Williamson’s deeply personal dialogue as the first point of narrative contact brought me into an intensely colourful life populated by several equally interesting individuals. Beyond what was written, I sought to understand subtext as I carefully read entries and noticed shifts in handwriting that coincided with shifts in mood or attempts to be secretive even in the act of documenting one’s life. Even though I began my journey of making notes about the contents of the items with the occasional furrowed brow, phases of “mild” infuriation and a certainty that I would absolutely not relate to any of the material, somewhere along the way I found my intellectual stand-offishness softened by glimmers of fundamentally human experiences like struggle, heartbreak, grief, and loss. Engaging with these documents made me particularly conscious of my politics as a feminist and a neurodivergent woman of colour, which were consistently challenged by Williamson’s individual documented standpoint. However, rather than being an intellectual barrier, these lived experiences combined with contemporary political and theoretical frameworks allowed me to critically engage with nuanced discourses of power through the act of documentation, gender, bodily autonomy, and mental health in Williamson’s historical and socio-cultural context.
I looked at the diaries as physical objects undergoing changes through the ages. From changes in branding for individual sellers over the decades to the visual progression of the hardcover clothbound diaries of the ’30s into the paperback notebooks with spiral binding in the late ’60s and early ’70s. The diaries acted as records in themselves that could be used to interpret shifts in demand, development of new products for sale, material costs, inflation, branding and marketing changes in the organisations, and the manufacture and sale of the items. Furthermore, engaging with the physical state of the items allowed me to learn a bit more about conservation as my supervisor, Angela, guided me through processes of documenting and quarantining archival material during conservation.
These two weeks have been immensely insightful. Every working day brought something new for me to learn and reinforced how much archival work genuinely called to me as a labour of love. I was able to catalogue 116(!!) items and re-package them for future scholarly use. I also got to witness the intense care and dedication with which the Special Collections team operated, being especially fascinated by the archival storage infrastructure. As an international student with Indian archival and digital humanities training, the opportunity helped me learn more about how to care for heritage items in a UK context. I learnt how to work efficiently under deadlines and gained confidence with regards to working in a professional environment. Overall, I truly enjoyed my time working at the Special Collections. The Team was especially helpful and welcoming, and I got to learn so much about archival work (and Henry Williamson, whom I knew very little about, by extension!)
With special thanks to Angela Mandrioli from the Special Collections team for her constant support and guidance during the project and to the Professional Pathways Team for their dedication to making student employment journeys more accessible.














































